BROKEN TEMPLESTHE SUBCONTINENT ATLASACROSS DYNASTIES & CENTURIES
911 reign records from a declared corpus of 162 source topics.
Indian subcontinent: premodern dynasties, regional states, governors, relevant external conquerors and later princely states. Modern insurgent polities are discovery context, not sovereign-state recognition. This declared corpus is not yet an exhaustive all-history ruler list.
These are source records, not 911 unique Muslim rulers or verified destroyers. Repeated reigns and overlapping regional lists remain visible. Mixed dynasties and religious transitions require individual checking. A ruler’s religion or reign alone does not establish responsibility for a damaged temple.
Extract explicit roster tables/lists; preserve source rows and repeated reigns; screen identifiable names against actor fields in the current atlas and source catalogue. This screening is not a biography-by-biography archival review. Religious transitions, aliases, overlap and gaps remain explicit.
See the latest search and passage-review outcome for every reign record ↗. The earlier name-matching status below is separate from this inventory-wide pass.
Read the closer review of 58 Mughal and Delhi rulers and the Multan source web ↗ · Tipu Sultan source review ↗
Download the complete ruler research ledger (JSON) · Download the reference network (JSON)
911 source records; 27 have candidate links or reviewed case trails.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khalji dynasty · 1204–1206 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khalji dynasty · 1206–1208 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khalji dynasty · (First term) 1208–1210 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khalji dynasty · 1210–1212 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khalji dynasty · (Second term) 1212–1227 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khalji dynasty · 1229–1230 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khalji dynasty · 1231 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1342–1358 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1358–1390 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1390–1411 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1411–1413 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1413 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1413–1414 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1414 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1415–1416 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1418–1433 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1433–1435 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1435–1459 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1459–1474 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1474–1481 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1481 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1481–1487 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1487 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1487–1489 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1489–1490 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1490–1494 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1494–1518 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1518–1533 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1533 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1533–1538 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1539–1541 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1541–1545 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1545–1554 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1554–1555 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1555–1561 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1561–1563 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1563–1564 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1564–1566 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1566–1572 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1572 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bengal Sultanate · 1572–1576 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ilyas Shahi dynasty · 1342–1358 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ilyas Shahi dynasty · 1358–1390 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ilyas Shahi dynasty · 1390–1411 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ilyas Shahi dynasty · 1411–1413 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ilyas Shahi dynasty · 1413 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ilyas Shahi dynasty · 1435–1459 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ilyas Shahi dynasty · 1459–1474 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ilyas Shahi dynasty · 1474–1481 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ilyas Shahi dynasty · 1481 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ilyas Shahi dynasty · 1481–1487 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bani Ganesh · 1415-1416 AD, 1418-1433 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bani Ganesh · 1433-1436 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Hussain Shahi dynasty · 1494–1519 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Hussain Shahi dynasty · 1519–1533 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Hussain Shahi dynasty · 1533 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Hussain Shahi dynasty · 1533–1538 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Karrani dynasty · 1564–1565 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Karrani dynasty · 1565–1572 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Karrani dynasty · 1572 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Karrani dynasty · 1572–1576 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawabs of Bengal · 1717–30 AD June 1727 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawabs of Bengal · 1727–1727 AD (for few days)
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawabs of Bengal · 1 July 1727 – 26 AD August 1739 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawabs of Bengal · 26 August 1739 – 29 AD April 1740 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawabs of Bengal · 29 April 1740 – 9 AD April 1756 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawabs of Bengal · 9 April 1756 – 23 AD June 1757 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawabs of Bengal · 2 June 1757 – 20 AD October 1760 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawabs of Bengal · 20 October 1760 – 7 AD July 1763 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawabs of Bengal · 25 July 1763 – 17 AD January 1765 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawabs of Bengal · 5 February 1765 – 8 AD May 1766 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawabs of Bengal · 22 May 1766 – 10 AD March 1770 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawabs of Bengal · 21 March 1770 – 6 AD September 1793 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawabs of Bengal · 1793 – 28 AD April 1810 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawabs of Bengal · 5 June 1810 – 6 AD August 1821 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawabs of Bengal · 1821 – 30 AD October 1824 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawabs of Bengal · 1824 – 3 AD October 1838 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawabs of Bengal · 29 October 1838 – 1 AD November 1880 AD (abdicated)
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Taraf Kingdom · 1240–1253 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Taraf Kingdom · 1253 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Taraf Kingdom · 1253–1260 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Taraf Kingdom · 1260–1304 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Taraf Kingdom · 1304 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Taraf Kingdom · 1610 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Taraf Kingdom · 1612–1617 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Taraf Kingdom · 1617 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Taraf Kingdom · 1617–1620 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Taraf Kingdom · 1770–1800 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 977–997 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 997–998 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 998–1030 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 1030 AD _1st reign
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 1030–1041 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 1041 AD _2nd reign
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 1041–1048 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 1048 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 1048–1049 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 1049–1052 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 1052–1053 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 1053–1059 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 1059–1099 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 1099–1115 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 1115–1116 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 1116–1117 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 1117–1157 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 1157–1160 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghaznavids · 1160–1186 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 10th-century AD– 1011 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1011–1035 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1035– 1060 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1060– 1080 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1080– 1100 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1100–1146 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1146–1149 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1149 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1149–1161 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1161–1163 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1163–1203 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1203–1206 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1206–1212 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1212–1213 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1213–1214 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1214–1215 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1152–1163 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1163–1192 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1192 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1192–1206 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ghurids · 1206–1215 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · July 1747 – 16 AD October 1772 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · 16 October 1772 AD – November 1772 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · November 1772 – 20 AD May 1793 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · 20 May 1793 – 25 AD July 1801 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · 25 July 1801 – 13 AD July 1803 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · 13 July 1803 – 3 AD May 1809 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · 3 May 1809 AD – February 1811 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · February 1811 AD – February 1811 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · February 1811 AD – September 1818 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · September 1818 AD – December 1818 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · December 1818 – 1823 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · 7 August 1839 – 5 AD April 1842 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · 5 April 1842 – 12 AD October 1842 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · 12 October 1842 AD – December 1842 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · May 1793 AD – December 1795 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · 20 May 1793 – 14 AD October 1797 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · 25 July 1801 AD – September 1818 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · September 1818 – 1826 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · 1826 AD – March 1842 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · March 1842 – 23 AD June 1851 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · 23 June 1851 – 15 AD September 1855 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · 15 September 1855 – 28 AD April 1856 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · 28 April 1856 – 25 AD October 1856 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · 25 October 1856 AD – September 1857 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · 27 July 1857 – 6 AD March 1863 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Durrani Empire · 6 March 1863 – 27 AD June 1863 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 861–884 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 884–913 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 913–943 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 943–973 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 973–987 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 987–987 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 987–1010 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1010–1026 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1026–1053 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1053–1068 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1068–1092 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1092–1098 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1098–1107 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1107–1107 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1107–1142 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1142–1181 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1181–1195 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1195–1222 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1222–1228 AD (1st reign)
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1228–1236 AD (1st reign)
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1236–1237 AD (2nd reign)
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1237–1241 AD (2nd reign)
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1241–1256 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1256–1259 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1259–1273 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1273–1283 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1283–1300 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1300–1315 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1315–1333 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1333–1336 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1336 AD–??
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · ??–1351 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1351–1352 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1352–1367 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1367–1371 AD (1st reign)
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1368–1370 AD (diarchy)
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1371–1389 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1389–1392 AD (2nd reign)
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1392–1404 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1404–1406 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1406–1412 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1412–1413 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1413 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1413–1428 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1428–1442 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1442 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1442–1444 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1444–1453 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1453–1461 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1461–1508 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1508–1524 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1520–1524 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1524–1554 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1554–1567 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1567–1585 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1585–1593 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 28 March 1593 – 1594 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1594 – 1 AD February 1601 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1 February 1601 – 12 AD April 1612 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1612–1614 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1614–1615 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1614–1615 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1615–1617 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1617–1617 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1617–1618 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1618–1619 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1619–1623 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 13 October 1625 – 1626 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1626–1627 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1627–1628 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1628–1628 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1737–1755 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1755–1757 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1757–1772 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1772–1775 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1775–1783 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1783–1801 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1801–1811 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1811–1828 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1828–1833 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1833–1840 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1840–1843 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1783–1811 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1811–1842 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1842–1894 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1894 – 5 AD March 1909 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 5 March 1909 – 8 AD February 1921 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 8 February 1921 – 25 AD December 1935 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 25 December 1935 – 19 AD July 1947 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 19 July 1947 – 10 AD November 1954 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1783 – 1806 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1806 – 1829 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
In Sindh · 1829 – 1843 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1010 – 1026 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1026 – 1053 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1053 – 1068 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1068 – 1092 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1092 – 1098 AD (as Regent)
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1092 – 1107 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1107 – 1142 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1142 – 1181 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1181 – 1195 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1195 – 1226 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · (1st reign) 1226 – 1228 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · (1st reign) 1228 AD- – 1236 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · (2nd reign) 1236 – 1237 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · (2nd reign) 1237 – 1241 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1241 – 1256 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1256 – 1259 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1259 – 1273 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1273 – 1283 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1283 – 1300 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1300 – 1315 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1315 – 1333 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1333 – 1336 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1336 – 1337 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1337 – 1341 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1341 – 1351 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1351 – 1390 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1390 – 1400 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Soomra dynasty · 1400 – 1440 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1351–1352 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1352–1367 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1367–1371 AD (1st reign)
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1368–1370 AD (diarchy)
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1371–1389 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1389–1392 AD (2nd reign)
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1392–1404 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1404–1406 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1406–1412 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1412 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1412–1413 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1413–1428 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1428–1442 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1442 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1442–1444 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1444–1453 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1453–1461 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1461–1508 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Samma dynasty · 1508–1524 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Tarkhan dynasty · 1554–1567 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Tarkhan dynasty · 1567–1585 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Tarkhan dynasty · 1585–1599 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Tarkhan dynasty · 1599–1612 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Tarkhan dynasty · 1612 AD–? AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Kalhora dynasty · 1700 – 1720 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Kalhora dynasty · 1720 – 1756 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Kalhora dynasty · 1756 – 1758 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Kalhora dynasty · 1758 – 1772 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Kalhora dynasty · 1772 – 1775 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Kalhora dynasty · 1775 – 1782 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Talpur dynasty · 1783 – 1802 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Talpur dynasty · 1802 – 1811 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Talpur dynasty · 1811 – 1828 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Talpur dynasty · 1828 – 1832 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Talpur dynasty · 1832 – 1840 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Talpur dynasty · 1840 – 1843 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khairpur (princely state) · 1783–1830 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khairpur (princely state) · 1830–1842 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khairpur (princely state) · 1842–1894 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khairpur (princely state) · 1894–1909 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khairpur (princely state) · 1909–1921 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khairpur (princely state) · 1921–1935 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khairpur (princely state) · 1935–1947 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khairpur (princely state) · 1947 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Langah Sultanate · 1445 – 1469 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Langah Sultanate · 1469 – 1498 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Langah Sultanate · 1498 – 1499 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Langah Sultanate · 1499 – 29 AD August 1502 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Langah Sultanate · 30 August 1502 – 1525 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Langah Sultanate · 1525 – 1527 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 1339 – 1342 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 1342 – 1342 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 1343 – 1354 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 1354 – 1373 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 1373 – 1389 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 1389 – 1412 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 1412 – 1418 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 1418 – 1419 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 1419 – 1420 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 1420 – 12 AD May 1470 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 12 May 1470 – 13 AD April 1472 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 13 April 1472 – 19 AD April 1484 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 19 April 1484 – 14 AD October 1486 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 14 October 1486 AD – July 1493 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · July 1493 – 1505 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 1505 – 1514 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 1514 AD – September 1515 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · September 1515 AD – August 1517 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · August 1517 AD – January 1528 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · January 1528 AD – April 1528 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · April 1528 AD – June 1530 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · June 1530 AD – July 1537 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · July 1537 – 1540 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 1540 AD – December 1540 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · December 1540 AD – December 1552 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · December 1552 – 1555 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 1555 – 1557 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Shah Mir dynasty · 1557 – 1561 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Chak dynasty · 1561–1563 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Chak dynasty · 1563–1570 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Chak dynasty · 1570–1578 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Chak dynasty · 1578–1579 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Chak dynasty · 1579–1580 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Chak dynasty · 1580–1586 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Chak dynasty · 1586–1589 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Chak dynasty · 1586 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · 760s–780 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · 780 AD _–_ 796 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · ?–997 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · 997–1057 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · 1057–1127 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · 1127–1205 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · 1205–1236 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · 1236–1241 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · 1241–1275 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · 1275 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · 1276–1345 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · 1345–1359 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · 1359–1397 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · 1397–1422 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · 1422–1449 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · 1449–1479 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · 1479 AD–?
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Trakhan dynasty · ?–1561 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Dir (princely state) · 1626–1676 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Dir (princely state) · 1676–1752 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Dir (princely state) · 1752–1804 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Dir (princely state) · 1804–1814 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Dir (princely state) · 1814–1822 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Dir (princely state) · 1822–1868 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Dir (princely state) · 1868–1870 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Dir (princely state) · 1870–1884 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Dir (princely state) · 1886–1890 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Dir (princely state) · 1890–1895 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Dir (princely state) · 1895–1904 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Dir (princely state) · 1904–1913 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Dir (princely state) · 1913–1914 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Dir (princely state) · 1914–1925 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Dir (princely state) · 1925–1947 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Dir (princely state) · 1947–1960 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Dir (princely state) · 1960 AD–Incumbent
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khandesh Sultanate · 1382 – 19 AD April 1399 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khandesh Sultanate · 1399 – 18 AD September 1437 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khandesh Sultanate · 1437 – 30 AD April 1441 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khandesh Sultanate · 1441 – 5 AD June 1457 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khandesh Sultanate · 1457 – 28 AD September 1501 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khandesh Sultanate · 1501 – 28 AD August 1508 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khandesh Sultanate · 1508 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khandesh Sultanate · c.1508 – 1 AD April 1509 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khandesh Sultanate · 1 April 1509 – 1520 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khandesh Sultanate · 1520 – 4 AD May 1535 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khandesh Sultanate · 1537 – 24 AD December 1566 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khandesh Sultanate · 1566 – 1576 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khandesh Sultanate · 1576 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khandesh Sultanate · 1576 – 5 AD February 1597 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Khandesh Sultanate · 1597 – 17 AD January 1601 AD (died 1624 AD)
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Jaunpur Sultanate · 1394–1399 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Jaunpur Sultanate · 1399–1402 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Jaunpur Sultanate · 1402–1440 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Jaunpur Sultanate · 1440–1457 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Jaunpur Sultanate · 1457–1458 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Jaunpur Sultanate · 1458–1479 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Sur Empire · 6 April 1538/17 AD May 1540 — 22 AD May 1545 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Sur Empire · 26 May 1545 — 22 AD November 1554 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Sur Empire · December 1554 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Sur Empire · 22 June 1555 — 1556 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 3 August 1347 – 11 AD February 1358 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 11 February 1358 – 21 AD April 1375 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 21 April 1375 – 16 AD April 1378 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 16 April 1378 – 21 AD May 1378 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 21 May 1378 – 20 AD April 1397 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 20 April 1397 – 14 AD June 1397 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 14 June 1397 – 15 AD November 1397 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 24 November 1397 – 1 AD October 1422 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 1 October 1422 – 17 AD April 1436 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 17 April 1436 – 6 AD May 1458 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 7 May 1458 – 4 AD September 1461 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 4 September 1461 – 30 AD July 1463 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 30 July 1463 – 26 AD March 1482 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 26 March 1482 – 27 AD December 1518 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 27 December 1518 – 15 AD December 1520 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 28 December 1520 – 5 AD March 1522 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 5 March 1522 – 1526 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bahmani Sultanate · 1525–1527 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Madurai Sultanate · 1335 AD – 1339 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Madurai Sultanate · 1339 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Madurai Sultanate · 1339 AD – 1340 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Madurai Sultanate · 1340 AD – 1344 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Madurai Sultanate · 1344 AD – 1345 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Madurai Sultanate · 1356 AD – 1358 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Madurai Sultanate · 1358 AD – 1368 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Madurai Sultanate · 1368 AD – 1378 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bidar Sultanate · 1489 – 1504 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bidar Sultanate · 1504 – 1542 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bidar Sultanate · 1542 – 1580 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bidar Sultanate · 1580 – 1587 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bidar Sultanate · 1587 – 1591 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bidar Sultanate · 1591 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bidar Sultanate · 1591 – 1601 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bidar Sultanate · 1601 – 1609 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bidar Sultanate · 1609 – 1619 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ahmadnagar Sultanate · 1490–1510 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ahmadnagar Sultanate · 1510–1553 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ahmadnagar Sultanate · 1553–1565 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ahmadnagar Sultanate · 1565–1588 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ahmadnagar Sultanate · 1588–1589 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ahmadnagar Sultanate · 1589–1591 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ahmadnagar Sultanate · 1591–1595 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ahmadnagar Sultanate · 1595–1600 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ahmadnagar Sultanate · 1596 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ahmadnagar Sultanate · 1600–1610 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ahmadnagar Sultanate · 1610–1631 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ahmadnagar Sultanate · 1631–1633 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Ahmadnagar Sultanate · 1633–1636 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bijapur Sultanate · 1490–1510 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bijapur Sultanate · 1510–1534 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bijapur Sultanate · 1534–1535 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bijapur Sultanate · 1535–1558 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bijapur Sultanate · 1558–1580 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bijapur Sultanate · 1580–1627 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bijapur Sultanate · 1627–1656 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bijapur Sultanate · 1656–1672 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bijapur Sultanate · 1672–1686 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Golconda Sultanate · 7 December 1518 – 2 AD September 1543 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Golconda Sultanate · 2 September 1543 – 22 AD January 1550 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Golconda Sultanate · 22 January 1550 – 1550 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Golconda Sultanate · 27 July 1550 – 5 AD June 1580 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Golconda Sultanate · 5 June 1580 – 11 AD January 1612 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Golconda Sultanate · 11 January 1612 – 1626 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Golconda Sultanate · 1626 – 21 AD April 1672 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Golconda Sultanate · 21 April 1672 – 22 AD September 1687 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Oudh State · 26 January 1722 – 19 AD March 1739 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Banda (state) · 1740–1761 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Banda (state) · 1761–1802 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Banda (state) · 1802 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Banda (state) · 1802–1825 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Banda (state) · 1823–1850 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Banda (state) · 1850–1858 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Banganapalle · 1783 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Banganapalle · 1822 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Banganapalle · 1848 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Banganapalle · 1849 - 7 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Banganapalle · 1868 - 21 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Banganapalle · 1905 - 19 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Banganapalle · 1905 - 22 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Banganapalle · 1922 - 23 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bhopal State · 1707–1728 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bhopal State · 1728–1742 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bhopal State · 1728-42 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bhopal State · 1742–1777 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bhopal State · 1777–1807 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bhopal State · 1807–1826 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bhopal State · 1807–1816 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bhopal State · 1793 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bhopal State · 1801 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bhopal State · 1826 – 1837 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bhopal State · 1837–1844 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bhopal State · 1860–1868 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bhopal State · 1844–1860 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bhopal State · 1901–1926 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Bhopal State · 1926–1949 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Loharu State · 1806–1827 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Loharu State · 1827–1835 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Loharu State · 1835 - 27 AD February 1869 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Loharu State · 27 February 1869 – 31 AD October 1884 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Loharu State · 31 October 1884 AD - April 1920 AD (abdicated)
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Loharu State · April 1920 - 30 AD October 1926 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Loharu State · 30 October 1926 – 15 AD August 1947 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Pathari State · 1872- 1942 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Tonk State · 1806–1834 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Tonk State · 1834–1864 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Tonk State · 1864–1867 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Tonk State · 1867–23 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Tonk State · 1930–31 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Tonk State · 1947–1948 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Tonk State · 1948-1974 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Tonk State · 1974–1993 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Tonk State · 1993 AD–present
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Kingdom of Rohilkhand · 1721–1748 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Kingdom of Rohilkhand · 1748–1754 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Kingdom of Rohilkhand · 1754–1764 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Kingdom of Rohilkhand · 1764–1774 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1661–1603 BC
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1603–1539 BC
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1539–1503 BC
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1503–1463 BC
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1463–1405 BC
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1405–1382 BC
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1382–1332 BC
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1332–1292 BC
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1292–1257 BC
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1257–1199 BC
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · c.1204–1206 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1206–1208 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1208–1210 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1210–1212 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1212–1227 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1229–1230 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1230–1231 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1227–1229 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1232–1233 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1233–1236 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1236 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1236–1246 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1246–1247 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1247–1251 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1251–1257 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1257–1259 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1259–1268 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1268–1272 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1272 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1272–1281 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1281–1287 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1287–1291 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1291–1300 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1300–1322 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1322–1324 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1324–1328 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1324–1328 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1328–1338 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1328–1338 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1324–1340 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1338–1349 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1349–1352 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1339–1342 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1339–1342 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1342–1352 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1352–1358 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1358–1390 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1390–1411 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1411–1412 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1413 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1412–1414 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1414–1416 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1415–1416 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1418–1433 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1433–1435 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1435–1459 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1459–1474 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1474–1481 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1481 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1481–1487 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1487 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1487–1489 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1489–1490 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1490–1494 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1494–1518 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1518–1533 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1533 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1533–1538 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1532–1538 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1538–1541 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1541–1545 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1545–1554 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1555 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1554–1555 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1555–1561 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1561–1563 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1563–1564 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1564–1566 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1566–1572 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1572 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1572–1576 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 25 September 1574 – 23 AD October 1575 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 23 October 1575 – 19 AD December 1578 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1579–1582 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1582–1583 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1583 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1583–1585 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1585–1586 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1586–1588 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1588–1594 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1597 – 1606 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 2 Sep 1606 – 1607 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1607–1608 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1608–1613 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1613–1617 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1617–1624 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1624–1625 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1625–1626 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1626–1627 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1627–1628 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1628–1632 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1632–1635 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1635–1639 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1639–1647 AD again 1652–1660 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1660–1663 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1664–1678 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1678 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 20 July 1678 – 6 AD October 1679 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1680–1688 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1689–1697 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1697–1712 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1717– 1727 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 1727 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · July 1727 – 26 AD August 1739 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 13 March 1739 AD – April 1740 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · 29 April 1740 – 16 AD April 1756 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of rulers of Bengal · April 1756 – 2 AD June 1757 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1141 – 1176 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1176 – 1184 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1184 – 1192 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1192 – 1198 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1198 – 1213 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1213 – 1232 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1232 – 1257 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1257 – 1263 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1263 – 1265 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1265 – 1267 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1267 – 1268 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1268 – 1277 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1277 – 1287 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1287 – 1293 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1293 – 1301 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1301 – 1306 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1306 – 1340 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1340 – 1347 AD _Deposed and assassinated
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1347 – 1362 AD _Deposed
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1362 – 1363 AD _Deposed and assassinated
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1363 – 1373 AD _Deposed
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1373 – 1376 AD Deposed and _assassinated
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1376 – 1379 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1379 – 1380 AD _Deposed
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1380 – 1384 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1385 – 1388 AD _Deposed
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1388 – 1388 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1388 – 1388 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1388 – 1398 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1398 – 1398 AD _Deposed
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1398 – 1409 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1409 – 1411 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1411 – 1411 AD _Accidental death
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1411 – 1411 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1411 – 1421 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1421 – 1421 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1421 – 1421 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1421 – 1443 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1443 – 1443 AD _Killed in battle
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1443 – 1467 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1467 – 1467 AD _Deposed
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1467 – 1468 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1468 – 1480 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1480 – 1480 AD _Deposed
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1480 – 1484 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1484 – 1485 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1485 – 1491 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1491 – 1492 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1492 – 1492 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1492 – 1492 AD _Deposed
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1492 – 1493 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1493 – 1495 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1495 – 1510 AD _Deposed
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1510 – 1511 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1511 – 1513 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1513 – 1513 AD _Killed
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1513 – 1529 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1529 – 1549 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1549 – 1551 AD _Assassinated
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1551 – 1552 AD _Deposed
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1554 – 1557 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1557 – 1558 AD _Killed in battle
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1558 – 1573 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1573 – 1583 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1583 – 1603 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1603 – 1632 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1632 – 1648 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1648 – 1687 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1687 – 1691 AD _Accidental death
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1691 – 1692 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1692 – 1692 AD _Possibly poisoned to death
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1692 – 1701 AD _Possibly poisoned to death
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1701 – 1701 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1701 – 1701 AD _Abdicated
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1701 – 1704 AD _Deposed
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1704 – 1720 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1720 – 1750 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1750 – 1757 AD _Died in captivity by Ali Raja
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1759 – 1766 AD _Abdicated
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1766 – 1774 AD _Assassinated after the throne was seized.
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1774 AD _Ascended after seizing throne from Dhiyamigili Dynasty – 1774 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1774 – 1779 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1779 – 1799 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1799 – 1835 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1835 – 1882 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1882 – 1886 AD _Abdicated
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1886 – 1888 AD _Abdicated
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1888 – 1892 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1892 – 1893 AD _Abdicated
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1893 – 1893 AD _Abdicated
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1893 – 1902 AD _Deposed
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1902 – 1934 AD _Deposed
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1935 – 1943 AD _Forced to abdicate
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1944 – 1952 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
List of monarchs of the Maldives · 1954 – 1968 AD
Role / scope: Religious transition / mixed roster needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Awadh · 1722– 19 AD March 1739 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Awadh · 1739– 5 AD October 1754 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Awadh · 1754– 26 AD January 1775 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Awadh · 26 January 1775– 20 AD April 1797 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Awadh · 21 September 1797– 21 AD January 1798 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Awadh · 21 January 1798– 11 AD July 1814 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Awadh · 11 July 1814– 19 AD October 1827 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Awadh · 19 October 1827– 7 AD July 1837 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Awadh · 7 July 1837– 7 AD May 1842 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Awadh · 7 May 1842– 13 AD February 1847 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Awadh · 13 February 1847– 11 AD February 1856 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Awadh · 11 February 1856– 5 AD July 1857 AD _Wife of Wajid Ali Shah and mother of Birjis Qadra_ (_in rebellion_)
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Awadh · 5 July 1857 – 3 AD March 1858 AD (_in rebellion_)
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Bhopal · 1672–1728 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Bhopal · 1728 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Bhopal · 1709–1742 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Bhopal · 1731–1777 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Bhopal · 1736–1807 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Bhopal · 1767–1826 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Bhopal · 1795–1869 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Bhopal · 1816–1844 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Junagadh · 1730–28 AD Sep 1758 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Junagadh · 28 Sep 1758–1760 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Junagadh · 1760–1762 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Junagadh · 1762–2 AD Dec 1774 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Junagadh · 2 Dec 1774–26 AD Feb 1811 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Junagadh · 26 Feb 1811–26 AD May 1840 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Junagadh · 26 May 1840–1851 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Junagadh · 1851–29 AD Sep 1882 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Junagadh · 29 Sep 1882–21 AD Jan 1892 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Junagadh · 23 Jan 1892–22 AD Jan 1911 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Junagadh · 1911–1920 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nawab of Junagadh · 22 Jan 1911–25 AD Feb 1948 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 1391–1403 AD ( _1st Reign_)
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 1403–1404 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 1404–1411 AD ( _2nd Reign_)
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 1411–1442 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 1442–1451 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 1451–1458 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 1458 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 25 May 1458 – 23 AD November 1511 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 23 November 1511 – 5 AD April 1526 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 1526 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 1526 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 1526–25 AD April 1535 AD ( _1st Reign_)
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 1536–13 AD February 1537 AD ( _2nd Reign_)
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 6 weeks; 1537 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 10 May 1537 – 1554 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 1554–1561 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 1561–1573 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Gujarat rulers · 1583 AD (Restored)
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1401–1406 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1406–1407 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1407–1408 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1408–1409 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1409–1435 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1435–1436 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1436–1469 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1469–1500 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1500–1510 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1511–1531 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 13 August 1511 AD–January 1512 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1531 – 1536 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1535 – 1536 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1536 – 1537 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1537 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1537 – 1542 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1542 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1542 – 1545 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1545 – 1552 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Malwa rulers · 1555 – 1562 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nizams of Hyderabad · 31 July 1724 – 1 AD June 1748 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nizams of Hyderabad · 1 June 1748 – 16 AD December 1750 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nizams of Hyderabad · 16 December 1750 – 13 AD February 1751 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nizams of Hyderabad · 13 February 1751 – 8 AD July 1762 AD ( _deposed_)
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nizams of Hyderabad · 8 July 1762 – 6 AD August 1803 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nizams of Hyderabad · 6 August 1803 – 21 AD May 1829 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nizams of Hyderabad · 21 May 1829 – 16 AD May 1857 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nizams of Hyderabad · 16 May 1857 – 26 AD February 1869 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nizams of Hyderabad · 26 February 1869 – 29 AD August 1911 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Nizams of Hyderabad · 29 August 1911 – 17 AD September 1948 AD ( _deposed_)
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗ · Linked entry (not necessarily read) ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Arakkal rulers · 1545–1591 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Arakkal rulers · 1591–1607 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Arakkal rulers · 1607–1610 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Arakkal rulers · 1610–1647 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Arakkal rulers · 1647–1655 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Arakkal rulers · 1655–1656 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Arakkal rulers · 1656–1691 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Arakkal rulers · 1691–1704 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Arakkal rulers · 1704–1720 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Arakkal rulers · 1720–1728 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Arakkal rulers · 1728–1732 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Arakkal rulers · 1732–1745 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Arakkal rulers · 1745–1777 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Arakkal rulers · 1777–1819 AD
Role / scope: Listed ruler; territorial and political role needs individual checking
Evidence screen: Name screened against current atlas and catalogue; individual source review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1526–1530 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗
Read case-specific roles and reference trails ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1530–1540 AD; 1555–1556 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1556–1605 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Source trails or claims identified; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1605–1627 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗
Read case-specific roles and reference trails ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1628–1658 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗
Read case-specific roles and reference trails ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1658–1707 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗
Read case-specific roles and reference trails ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1707 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1707–1712 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1712–1713 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1713–1719 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Source trails or claims identified; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1719 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1719 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1719–1748 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1748–1754 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1754–1759 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1759–1760 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1760–1788 AD; 1788–1806 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1788 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1806–1837 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1837–1857 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1206–1210 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗
Read case-specific roles and reference trails ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1210–1211 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1211–1236 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗
Read case-specific roles and reference trails ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1236 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1236–1240 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1240–1242 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1242–1246 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1246–1266 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1266–1287 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1287–1290 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1290 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1290–1296 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗
Read case-specific roles and reference trails ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1296 AD
Role / scope: Short-lived rival claimant
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1296–1316 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗
Read case-specific roles and reference trails ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1316 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1316–1320 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1320 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1320–1325 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1325–1351 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Source trails or claims identified; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1351–1388 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗
Read case-specific roles and reference trails ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1388–1389 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1389–1390 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1390–1394 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Source trails or claims identified; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1394 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review. The retrieved biography has no sources; roster chronology is separately listed.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1394–1413 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Source trails or claims identified; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1414–1421 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1421–1434 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1434–1445 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1445–1451 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1451–1489 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1489–1517 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗
Read case-specific roles and reference trails ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1517–1526 AD
Role / scope: Ruler in the main roster
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗
Read case-specific roles and reference trails ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · c. 1394/1395 AD–1398/1399 AD
Role / scope: Rival Tughluq sultan
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Delhi Sultanate · 1413–1414 AD
Role / scope: Interregnum ruler
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1719 AD
Role / scope: Regional claimant
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1720 AD
Role / scope: Rival claimant
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1707–1709 AD
Role / scope: Deccan claimant
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal Empire · 1712 AD
Role / scope: Succession claimant
Evidence screen: No case identified in this screen; Biography sacred-site passages and the indexed Eaton table screened. This is a first pass, not an exhaustive archival review.
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mysore · 1761–1782 AD
Role / scope: De facto ruler
Evidence screen: Biography retrieved; candidate matching only, individual review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mysore · 1782–1799 AD
Role / scope: Ruler
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Umayyad Sind · 711–715 AD
Role / scope: Conquering commander and governor
Evidence screen: Candidate links found; inspect event attribution and original source
Roster source ↗ · Captured bibliography ↗
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Timurid invasion of the subcontinent · 1398–1399 AD campaign
Role / scope: External conqueror; campaign dates, not complete reign
Evidence screen: Name too ambiguous for safe automatic matching; manual identification required
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Afsharid invasion of the subcontinent · 1738–1739 AD campaign
Role / scope: External conqueror; campaign dates, not complete reign
Evidence screen: Biography retrieved; candidate matching only, individual review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal claimant · 1627–1628 AD
Role / scope: Brief enthronement / claimant
Evidence screen: Biography retrieved; candidate matching only, individual review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal appanage and rival · 1530–1553 AD
Role / scope: Appanage ruler and rival; not a main-line emperor
Evidence screen: Biography retrieved; candidate matching only, individual review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal claimant · 1657–1658 AD
Role / scope: Regional claimant
Evidence screen: Biography retrieved; candidate matching only, individual review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
Latest research-pass outcome ↗
Mughal succession contest · 1657–1659 AD
Role / scope: Succession contender, not a crowned emperor
Evidence screen: Biography retrieved; candidate matching only, individual review pending
No link has been established in the current indexed material. This is not a finding that no temple damage occurred.
155 of 162 source topics were retrieved. Some are aliases or supporting biographies; some lack an extractable roster. This is not a count of distinct dynasties. Regional-language histories, original chronicles, inscriptions and local records remain necessary.
The survey follows the broad dynasty index into individual lists and records all captured bibliographies. The Met’s chronology and Bosworth’s The New Islamic Dynasties supplied additional discovery and cross-checking; neither is a list of temple destruction. Chronological discrepancies are retained for review.
Metropolitan Museum chronology ↗ · Bosworth chronology, accessed section ↗
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Alias or overlapping roster
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Related roster: List_of_rulers_of_Bengal. Not counted as a separate complete polity or duplicate ruler list.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Alias or overlapping roster
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Related roster: Gibarid_dynasty. Not counted as a separate complete polity or duplicate ruler list.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Alias or overlapping roster
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Related roster: List_of_sultans_of_Delhi. Not counted as a separate complete polity or duplicate ruler list.
Alias or overlapping roster
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Related roster: List_of_sultans_of_Delhi. Not counted as a separate complete polity or duplicate ruler list.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Alias or overlapping roster
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Related roster: Sayyid_dynasty. Not counted as a separate complete polity or duplicate ruler list.
Alias or overlapping roster
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Related roster: List_of_sultans_of_Delhi. Not counted as a separate complete polity or duplicate ruler list.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Alias or overlapping roster
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Related roster: Khandesh_Sultanate. Not counted as a separate complete polity or duplicate ruler list.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Alias or overlapping roster
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Related roster: List_of_rulers_of_the_Kingdom_of_Mysore. Not counted as a separate complete polity or duplicate ruler list.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Alias or overlapping roster
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Related roster: Nawabs_of_Bengal. Not counted as a separate complete polity or duplicate ruler list.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Discovery record; political status, religious transition and overlap require checking. Names and dates in an index are not proof of temple damage.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
retrieval-unavailable
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
retrieval-unavailable
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
Alias or overlapping roster
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
Related roster: Carnatic_Sultanate. Not counted as a separate complete polity or duplicate ruler list.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Alias or overlapping roster
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
Related roster: Tonk_State. Not counted as a separate complete polity or duplicate ruler list.
retrieval-unavailable
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
retrieval-unavailable
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
No supported roster table/list extracted. This does not mean the polity had no other rulers; narrative-only or unavailable rosters remain a coverage gap.
retrieval-unavailable
Supporting biography, cross-regional roster or source index; not necessarily a separate polity.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supplementary roster; dates and political role require individual checking.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supplementary roster; dates and political role require individual checking.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supplementary roster; dates and political role require individual checking.
Article retrieved; roster extraction reviewed for format
Supplementary roster; dates and political role require individual checking.
retrieval-unavailable
Supplementary roster; dates and political role require individual checking.
retrieval-unavailable
Supplementary roster; dates and political role require individual checking.
The catalogue is still incomplete. Automated extraction and name matching are labeled separately from selected-passage review; neither constitutes specialist verification of every ruler or every temple claim.