BROKEN TEMPLESTHE SUBCONTINENT ATLAS
← Back to the map

BEYOND THE MAPPED DOSSIERS

A larger record.
Open to examination.

2,289 extracted source records. 146 mapped histories.

Search the catalogue ↓

Browse named entries from historical surveys, archaeological registers and official damage assessments. These are source records, not a count of unique destroyed temples. Several entries may concern the same place; one entry may describe a group. Each preserves its source and the work still needed.

How to read this catalogue

Official assessments describe reported physical damage. Archaeological remains often have no known loss date or destroyer. Historical compilations include claims about later buildings and reused material; those claims await independent checks. Dates on later monuments are not treated as temple destruction dates. Earthquake losses remain separate from intentional acts.

Download JSON ↗ · Download CSV ↗ · Article bibliographies & research queue ↗

2,289 source records · page 48 of 58

Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Mangalvedh · Sangli District · MAHARASHTRA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MAHARASHTRA; Sangli District; Mangalvedh; extracted line 3061

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-a33bb0667493
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Dabhoi · Baroda District · GUJARAT

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

GUJARAT; Baroda District; Dabhoi; extracted line 1389

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-a46d9e40db68
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Udayagiri · Nellore District · ANDHRA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

ANDHRA PRADESH; Nellore District; Udayagiri; extracted line 625

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-a83089d10055
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Daulatabad · Aurangabad District · MAHARASHTRA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MAHARASHTRA; Aurangabad District; Daulatabad; extracted line 2861

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-aed6b4f01c6b
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Asirgarh · West Nimar District · MADHYA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MADHYA PRADESH; West Nimar District; Asirgarh; extracted line 2752

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-b52fef6d7a43
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Damoh District · Damoh District · MADHYA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MADHYA PRADESH; Damoh District; ; extracted line 2418

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-b8e64c9cab07
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Mudgal · Raichur District · KARNATAKA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KARNATAKA; Raichur District; Mudgal; extracted line 2230

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-b9a0b000ccae
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Zafarabad · Jaunpur District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Jaunpur District; Zafarabad; extracted line 4406

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-c5098983edd8
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Annamalai · Coimbatore District · TAMIL NADU

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

TAMIL NADU; Coimbatore District; Annamalai; extracted line 3624

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-c93f8ce92ae3
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Bulandshahar · Bulandshahar District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Bulandshahar District; Bulandshahar; extracted line 4167

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-cabeb23cdf06
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Nimsar · Lucknow District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Lucknow District; Nimsar; extracted line 4454

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-cc06117b9c16
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Chunar · Mirzapur District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Mirzapur District; Chunar; extracted line 4503

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-d6a3ff789d57
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Raichur · Raichur District · KARNATAKA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KARNATAKA; Raichur District; Raichur; extracted line 2260

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-e8f0e5a955a2
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Huvinhadgalli · Bellary District · KARNATAKA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KARNATAKA; Bellary District; Huvinhadgalli; extracted line 1917

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-ebe9763b19cb
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Patancheru · Medak District · ANDHRA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

ANDHRA PRADESH; Medak District; Patancheru; extracted line 591

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-eebbc7b29ec7
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Junnar · Pune District · MAHARASHTRA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MAHARASHTRA; Pune District; Junnar; extracted line 3039

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-f886221e05f6
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Taltam Fort · Aurangabad District · MAHARASHTRA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MAHARASHTRA; Aurangabad District; Taltam Fort; extracted line 2887

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-f9766236c0b0
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort and City Gates

Hansi · Hissar District · HARYANA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

HARYANA; Hissar District; Hansi; extracted line 1759

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-2df46447dd54
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort and Gateways

Siddhavatam · Cuddapah District · ANDHRA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

ANDHRA PRADESH; Cuddapah District; Siddhavatam; extracted line 420

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-65b4f0649508
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort and Masjid

Ghausgah · Muzaffarnagar District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Muzaffarnagar District; Ghausgah; extracted line 4540

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-906ff62c4644
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort and several other Muslim buildings

Gurrumkonda · Cuddapah District · ANDHRA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

ANDHRA PRADESH; Cuddapah District; Gurrumkonda; extracted line 409

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-90fe35f691a0
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort built by Shykh Farid

Faridpur · Bareilly District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Bareilly District; Faridpur; extracted line 4148

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-6f547ae4dcb6
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort built by Tipu Sultan

Palghat · KERALA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KERALA; ; Palghat; extracted line 2383

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-06fdecd78c9f
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort built in the reign of Farrukh Siyar

Surat · Surat District · GUJARAT

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

GUJARAT; Surat District; Surat; extracted line 1667

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-eb71cd3bd076
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort Gates

Monghyr · Monghyr District · BIHAR

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

BIHAR; Monghyr District; Monghyr; extracted line 1000

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-929e89b58016
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort of Firuz Shah Tughlaq

Hissar · Hissar District · HARYANA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

HARYANA; Hissar District; Hissar; extracted line 1773

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-bc05971d43eb
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort of Sher Shah Suri

Shergarh · Kota District · RAJASTHAN

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

RAJASTHAN; Kota District; Shergarh; extracted line 3354

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-4a446f014761
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort Walls and Towers

Kalyani · Bidar District · KARNATAKA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KARNATAKA; Bidar District; Kalyani; extracted line 1974

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-966129ee21ae
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort with a Masjid inside

Kiratpur · Bijnor District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Bijnor District; Kiratpur; extracted line 4154

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-1d3a52945a7b
Material-reuse claim — unverified

GaDhi Gate

Mangrol · Junagarh District · GUJARAT

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

GUJARAT; Junagarh District; Mangrol; extracted line 1458

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-e43ceb25bc5e
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Ganj-i-Shahidan

Zafarabad · Jaunpur District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Jaunpur District; Zafarabad; extracted line 4404

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-4ca644bd12fa
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Garden Pavilion

Lokbavan · KASHMIR

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KASHMIR; ; Lokbavan; extracted line 2308

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-bdd64e152d25
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Gateway to the Hill Fort

Gooty · Anantpur District · ANDHRA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

ANDHRA PRADESH; Anantpur District; Gooty; extracted line 366

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-15b27f9ec00a
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Ghulam Khan-ki-Masjid

Mandor · Jodhpur District · RAJASTHAN

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

RAJASTHAN; Jodhpur District; Mandor; extracted line 3330

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-23fe1c43c71d
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Gopi Talav

Surat · Surat District · GUJARAT

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

GUJARAT; Surat District; Surat; extracted line 1669

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-2b410e0f6569
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Graveyard

Basarh · Vaishali District · BIHAR

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

BIHAR; Vaishali District; Basarh; extracted line 1146

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-b63bb9571728
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Graveyard inside the village

Gandhawal · Dewas District · MADHYA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MADHYA PRADESH; Dewas District; Gandhawal; extracted line 2430

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-be6ec05d4557
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Gujari Mahal

Hissar · Hissar District · HARYANA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

HARYANA; Hissar District; Hissar; extracted line 1777

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-b525b6186c8b
Material-reuse claim — unverified

HammAm Darwaza Masjid

Jaunpur · Jaunpur District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Jaunpur District; Jaunpur; extracted line 4371

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-9d0f8352e1bb
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Hauz-i-Shamsi

Badaun · Badaun District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Badaun District; Badaun; extracted line 4079

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-d0d8cef48222

Inventories consulted

The full source bodies remain in the research cache. This public catalogue contains an index of factual fields and source locators. It is incomplete, and the source families have different coverage and evidentiary limits.

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 · 1,870 records

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Read original inventory ↗

Accessed 2026-09-28 · Historical compilation

Captured reference trail

These entries are listed in this inventory. Their original editions are not all assessed.

  1. History of Aurangzeb, Calcutta, 1925-52. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  2. Religious Policy of the Mughal Emperors, Bombay, 1962. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  3. Archaeological Survey of India, Annual Report 1925-26. Pp. 129-30. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  4. Ibid., p. 129. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  5. Ibid., p. l28. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  6. Ibid., 1907-08, p. 113. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  7. Ibid., Pp. 114. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  8. Ibid., p. 114-15. Technical details have been omitted and emphasis added. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  9. Ibid., p. 116. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  10. Ibid., p. 120. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  11. Ibid., p. 126. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  12. Ibid., p. 61. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  13. Ibid., 1907-08, Pp. 47, to 72. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  14. Ibid., 1903-04, p. 86. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  15. Ibid., 1902-3, p. 52. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  16. Ibid., 1921-22, p. 83. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  17. Ibid., p. 84. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  18. Ibid., 1902-03, p. 56. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  19. Ibid., 1933-34, Pp. 36-37. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  20. Ibid., 1902-03, Pp. 16-17. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  21. Ibid., 1993-4, Pp. 31-32. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  22. Ibid., 1902-03, Pp. 17-18. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  23. Ibid., 1903-04, p. 43. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  24. Ibid., p. 63. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  25. Ibid., 1904-05, p. 24. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  26. Ibid., 1929-30, p. 29. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  27. Ibid., 1928-29, Pp. 167-68. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  28. Robert Sewell, A Forgotten Empire, New Delhi Reprint, 1962, Pp. 199-200. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  29. Archaeological Survey of India, Volume I : Four Reports Made During the Years 1862-63-64-65, Varanasi Reprint, 1972, Pp. 440-41. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  30. Ratan Pribhdas Hingorani, Sites Index to A.S.I. Circle Reports New Delhi 1978, Pp. 17-262. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  31. S.A.A. Rizvi, History of Sufism in India, Volume 1, New Delhi, 1978, P. 189. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  32. Ghulam Abdul Qadir Nazir, Bahr-i-Azam or Travels of Azam Shah Nawwab Walajah, 1823, Madras, 1960, p. 128. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  33. Ibid., p. 64. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  34. Ibid., p. 128. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
Archaeological Survey of India: centrally protected monuments register · 141 records

Only sacred-site rows explicitly describing ruins, remains, missing fabric or damage are selected. Protection alone is not evidence of destruction. This register generally does not date losses or identify a responsible actor. Historic administrative labels are preserved.

Read original inventory ↗

Accessed 2026-09-28 · Archaeological inventory
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 · 156 records

Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.

Read original inventory ↗

Accessed 2026-09-28 · Official damage assessment
Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 · 80 records

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Read original inventory ↗

Accessed 2026-09-28 · Historical scholarship

Captured reference trail

These entries are listed in this inventory. Their original editions are not all assessed.

  1. Epigraphia Indo-Moslemica · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  2. Epigraphia Indica, Arabic & Persian Supplement · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  3. Annual Report of Indian Epigraphy · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  4. Indian Antiquary · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  5. Jahangir, Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri, tr. A. Rogers, (Delhi, 1968), v. 1 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  6. Firishta, Tarikh-i Firishta tr. J. Briggs, History of the Rise of the Mahomedan Power in India (Calcutta, 1971), 4 vols. · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  7. Kanbo, `Amal-i Salih (text: Lahore, 1967), v. 2 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  8. A. Butterworth and V.V. Chetty. A Collection of the Inscriptions on Copper- Plates & Stones in the Nellore District (Madras, 1905), v. 3 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  9. Khafi Khan, Khafi Khan’s History of `Alamgir, tr. S.M. Haq (Karachi, 1975) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  10. A. Cunningham, Four Reports Made during 1862-65 (Varanasi, 1972) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  11. S.N. Sinha, Subah of Allahabad under the Great Mughals (New Delhi, 1974) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  12. Saqi Must`ad Khan, Maasir-i `Alamgiri, tr. J. Sarkar (Calcutta, 1947) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  13. Saqi Must`ad Khan, Maasir-i `Alamgiri (text: Calcutta, 1871) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  14. Nizamuddin Ahmad, Tabaqat-i Akbari, tr. B. De (Calcutta, 1973), 3 vols. · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  15. Ishwardas Nagar, Futuhat-i `Alamgiri, tr. T. Ahmad (Delhi, 1978) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  16. Surendranath Sen, ed. & tr., Siva Chhatrapati (Calcutta, 1920), v.1 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  17. P. Sreenivasachar, ed., Corpus of Inscriptions in the Telingana Districts of H.E.M. the Nizam’s Dominions, pt. 2 (Hyderabad, 1940) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  18. Shah Nawaz Khan, Maathir-ul-Umara, tr. H. Beveridge (Patna, 1979), v. 1 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  19. Z.A. Desai, Published Muslim Inscriptions of Rajasthan (Jaipur, 1971) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  20. G. Roerich, tr., Biography of Dharmaswamin (Patna, 1959) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  21. Minhaj-i Siraj, Tabakat-i Nasiri, tr. H. Raverty (New Delhi, 1970), v. 1 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  22. Chattopadhyaya, D., ed., Taranatha’s History of Buddhism in India (Calcutta, 1980) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  23. Hasan Nizami, Taj al-ma`athir, in Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 2 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  24. Amir Khusrau, Miftah al-futuh, in Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 3 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  25. Amir Khusrau, Khaza’in al-futuh, in Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 3 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  26. Shams-i Siraj, Tarikh-i Firuz Shahi, in Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 3 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  27. Zia al-Din Barani, Tarikh-i Firuz Shahi, Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 3 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  28. Khwajah Ni`mat Allah, Tarikh-i Khan-Jahani wa makhzan-i-Afghani (text: Dacca, 1960), v. 1 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  29. Sikandar bin Muhammad, Mirat-i Sikandari, in E.C. Bayley, Local Muhammadan Dynasties: Gujarat, ed. N Singh (repr. New Delhi, 1970) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  30. Azad al-Husaini, Nau-Bahar-i Murshid Quli Khani, tr., Jadu Nath Sarkar, Bengal Nawabs (1952, repr. Calcutta, 1985) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  31. Abd al-Hamid Lahori, Badshah-nama, in Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 7 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  32. South Indian Inscriptions (New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  33. George Michell, “City as Cosmogram,” South Asian Studies 8 (1992) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  34. Jonaraja, Rajatarangini, ed. S.L. Sadhu, trans. J.C. Dutt (repr. New Delhi, 1993) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  35. Iqtidar Husain Siddiqui, tr., Waqi`at-e-Mushtaqui of Shaikh Rizq Ullah Mushtaqui (New Delhi, 1993) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  36. Jagadish Narayan Sarkar, Life of Mir Jumla (Calcutta, 1952) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
Bangladesh 1989 incident report: translation reproduced in Goel, volume I appendix · 42 records

Translation attributed to the Hindu Buddhist Christian Unity Council. The translated report was read; its original Bengali edition and independent corroboration remain unexamined. Named shrines are leads, not adjudicated events. Source-era district names and uncertain localities are preserved. Unnamed regional totals are not multiplied into temples.

Read original inventory ↗

Accessed 2026-09-28 · Reported incidents / translated compilation