BROKEN TEMPLESTHE SUBCONTINENT ATLAS
← Back to the map

BEYOND THE MAPPED DOSSIERS

A larger record.
Open to examination.

2,289 extracted source records. 146 mapped histories.

Search the catalogue ↓

Browse named entries from historical surveys, archaeological registers and official damage assessments. These are source records, not a count of unique destroyed temples. Several entries may concern the same place; one entry may describe a group. Each preserves its source and the work still needed.

How to read this catalogue

Official assessments describe reported physical damage. Archaeological remains often have no known loss date or destroyer. Historical compilations include claims about later buildings and reused material; those claims await independent checks. Dates on later monuments are not treated as temple destruction dates. Earthquake losses remain separate from intentional acts.

Download JSON ↗ · Download CSV ↗ · Article bibliographies & research queue ↗

2,289 source records · page 47 of 58

Material-reuse claim — unverified

Dargah of Shah Bukhari

Devikot · Dinajpur District · BENGAL

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

BENGAL; Dinajpur District; Devikot; extracted line 784

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-8305a733ab5c
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Dargah of Shah Mir Hasan and Mir Husain

Raichur · Raichur District · KARNATAKA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KARNATAKA; Raichur District; Raichur; extracted line 2252

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-9e14506d5843
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Dargah of Shah Shafi

Safipur · Unao District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Unao District; Safipur; extracted line 4673

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-142185cfc0bc
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Dargah of Shah Sultan Pir

Devikot · Dinajpur District · BENGAL

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

BENGAL; Dinajpur District; Devikot; extracted line 788

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-c92775c8c0e0
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Dargah of Shykh Ahmad Khattu Ganj Baksh (d

Sarkhej · Ahmadabad District · GUJARAT

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

GUJARAT; Ahmadabad District; Sarkhej; extracted line 1354

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-6ba9c7961a1c
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Dargah of Shykh Sahib

Shaikhupura · Nalanda District · BIHAR

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

BIHAR; Nalanda District; Shaikhupura; extracted line 1037

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-c978c18fa0c1
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Dargah of Shykh Salahu’d-Din Abu’l Muhammad of Balkh (d

Kaithal · Kurukshetra District · HARYANA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

HARYANA; Kurukshetra District; Kaithal; extracted line 1803

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-ea00fe25abee
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Dargah of Sikandar Shah Shahid (d

Prantij · Sabarkantha District · GUJARAT

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

GUJARAT; Sabarkantha District; Prantij; extracted line 1639

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-9f3a521f7ffb
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Dargah of Tanna Pir

Mandor · Jodhpur District · RAJASTHAN

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

RAJASTHAN; Jodhpur District; Mandor; extracted line 3332

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-8b66fc8e4f9c
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Dargah of Zafar Khan

Tribeni · Hooghly District · BENGAL

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

BENGAL; Hooghly District; Tribeni; extracted line 814

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-09b3c4c1feda
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Dargah outside the village

Bekkunal · Bijapur District · KARNATAKA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KARNATAKA; Bijapur District; Bekkunal; extracted line 1991

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-235b204eb431
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Dariba Masjid

Jaunpur · Jaunpur District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Jaunpur District; Jaunpur; extracted line 4365

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-9ebec384afd1
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Dina or Jami Masjid

Kannauj · Farrukhabad District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Farrukhabad District; Kannauj; extracted line 4209

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-a0084d7cf7be
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Dini Masjid

Rohtak · Rohtak District · HARYANA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

HARYANA; Rohtak District; Rohtak; extracted line 1841

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-926e6bcb95e2
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Early Sharqi buildings including many Maqbaras

Zafarabad · Jaunpur District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Jaunpur District; Zafarabad; extracted line 4408

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-dd304435334a
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fath Minar

Pandua · Hooghly District · BENGAL

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

BENGAL; Hooghly District; Pandua; extracted line 806

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-95cf48eb4ef1
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Faujdari Masjid

Bayana · Bharatpur District · RAJASTHAN

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

RAJASTHAN; Bharatpur District; Bayana; extracted line 3242

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-43b163e3b43b
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Sarangpur · Dewas District · MADHYA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MADHYA PRADESH; Dewas District; Sarangpur; extracted line 2439

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-1925522cbb8a
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Eluru · West Godavari District · ANDHRA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

ANDHRA PRADESH; West Godavari District; Eluru; extracted line 681

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-272c0c05336b
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Bhonrasa · Vidisha District · MADHYA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MADHYA PRADESH; Vidisha District; Bhonrasa; extracted line 2704

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-27949d797f30
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Sholapur · Sholapur District · MAHARASHTRA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MAHARASHTRA; Sholapur District; Sholapur; extracted line 3093

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-2956e03db2e8
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Adoni · Kurnool District · ANDHRA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

ANDHRA PRADESH; Kurnool District; Adoni; extracted line 533

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-2d2b4dd3ce63
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Jalesar · Etah District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Etah District; Jalesar; extracted line 4188

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-3247d8adf385
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Hingtar · Ghazipur District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Ghazipur District; Hingtar; extracted line 4283

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-331e41a78456
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Amba Jogi · Ahmadnagar District · MAHARASHTRA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MAHARASHTRA; Ahmadnagar District; Amba Jogi; extracted line 2772

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-3fa31fc006ab
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Maheshwar · Indore District · MADHYA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MADHYA PRADESH; Indore District; Maheshwar; extracted line 2565

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-47afe39cf913
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Bankapur · Dharwad District · KARNATAKA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KARNATAKA; Dharwad District; Bankapur; extracted line 2090

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-480241b23134
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Jaunpur · Jaunpur District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Jaunpur District; Jaunpur; extracted line 4377

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-49472dc91c08
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Penukonda · Anantpur District · ANDHRA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

ANDHRA PRADESH; Anantpur District; Penukonda; extracted line 371

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-4951bfbc8836
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Ajaigarh · Panna District · MADHYA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MADHYA PRADESH; Panna District; Ajaigarh; extracted line 2603

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-4cda41f783fe
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Chehar · Vaishali District · BIHAR

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

BIHAR; Vaishali District; Chehar; extracted line 1124

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-52441765946e
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Kaman · Bharatpur District · RAJASTHAN

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

RAJASTHAN; Bharatpur District; Kaman; extracted line 3263

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-541229a6c7c4
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Mandsaur · Mandsaur District · MADHYA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MADHYA PRADESH; Mandsaur District; Mandsaur; extracted line 2587

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-54b3c9680985
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Medak · Medak District · ANDHRA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

ANDHRA PRADESH; Medak District; Medak; extracted line 580

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-65e475e41d68
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Rae Bareli · Rae Bareli District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Rae Bareli District; Rae Bareli; extracted line 4601

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-6eab17d14222
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Badi Khatu · Nagaur District · RAJASTHAN

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

RAJASTHAN; Nagaur District; Badi Khatu; extracted line 3389

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-70830e46561d
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Mehdipur · Indore District · MADHYA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MADHYA PRADESH; Indore District; Mehdipur; extracted line 2571

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-9117e9028970
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Sagar · Gulbarga District · KARNATAKA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KARNATAKA; Gulbarga District; Sagar; extracted line 2172

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-92d56f0e825e
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Galna · Nasik District · MAHARASHTRA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MAHARASHTRA; Nasik District; Galna; extracted line 2994

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-93418e68651f
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Fort

Pawaya · Shivpuri District · MADHYA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MADHYA PRADESH; Shivpuri District; Pawaya; extracted line 2654

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-97d8a9ee74e0

Inventories consulted

The full source bodies remain in the research cache. This public catalogue contains an index of factual fields and source locators. It is incomplete, and the source families have different coverage and evidentiary limits.

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 · 1,870 records

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Read original inventory ↗

Accessed 2026-09-28 · Historical compilation

Captured reference trail

These entries are listed in this inventory. Their original editions are not all assessed.

  1. History of Aurangzeb, Calcutta, 1925-52. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  2. Religious Policy of the Mughal Emperors, Bombay, 1962. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  3. Archaeological Survey of India, Annual Report 1925-26. Pp. 129-30. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  4. Ibid., p. 129. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  5. Ibid., p. l28. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  6. Ibid., 1907-08, p. 113. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  7. Ibid., Pp. 114. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  8. Ibid., p. 114-15. Technical details have been omitted and emphasis added. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  9. Ibid., p. 116. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  10. Ibid., p. 120. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  11. Ibid., p. 126. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  12. Ibid., p. 61. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  13. Ibid., 1907-08, Pp. 47, to 72. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  14. Ibid., 1903-04, p. 86. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  15. Ibid., 1902-3, p. 52. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  16. Ibid., 1921-22, p. 83. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  17. Ibid., p. 84. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  18. Ibid., 1902-03, p. 56. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  19. Ibid., 1933-34, Pp. 36-37. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  20. Ibid., 1902-03, Pp. 16-17. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  21. Ibid., 1993-4, Pp. 31-32. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  22. Ibid., 1902-03, Pp. 17-18. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  23. Ibid., 1903-04, p. 43. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  24. Ibid., p. 63. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  25. Ibid., 1904-05, p. 24. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  26. Ibid., 1929-30, p. 29. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  27. Ibid., 1928-29, Pp. 167-68. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  28. Robert Sewell, A Forgotten Empire, New Delhi Reprint, 1962, Pp. 199-200. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  29. Archaeological Survey of India, Volume I : Four Reports Made During the Years 1862-63-64-65, Varanasi Reprint, 1972, Pp. 440-41. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  30. Ratan Pribhdas Hingorani, Sites Index to A.S.I. Circle Reports New Delhi 1978, Pp. 17-262. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  31. S.A.A. Rizvi, History of Sufism in India, Volume 1, New Delhi, 1978, P. 189. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  32. Ghulam Abdul Qadir Nazir, Bahr-i-Azam or Travels of Azam Shah Nawwab Walajah, 1823, Madras, 1960, p. 128. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  33. Ibid., p. 64. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  34. Ibid., p. 128. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
Archaeological Survey of India: centrally protected monuments register · 141 records

Only sacred-site rows explicitly describing ruins, remains, missing fabric or damage are selected. Protection alone is not evidence of destruction. This register generally does not date losses or identify a responsible actor. Historic administrative labels are preserved.

Read original inventory ↗

Accessed 2026-09-28 · Archaeological inventory
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 · 156 records

Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.

Read original inventory ↗

Accessed 2026-09-28 · Official damage assessment
Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 · 80 records

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Read original inventory ↗

Accessed 2026-09-28 · Historical scholarship

Captured reference trail

These entries are listed in this inventory. Their original editions are not all assessed.

  1. Epigraphia Indo-Moslemica · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  2. Epigraphia Indica, Arabic & Persian Supplement · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  3. Annual Report of Indian Epigraphy · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  4. Indian Antiquary · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  5. Jahangir, Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri, tr. A. Rogers, (Delhi, 1968), v. 1 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  6. Firishta, Tarikh-i Firishta tr. J. Briggs, History of the Rise of the Mahomedan Power in India (Calcutta, 1971), 4 vols. · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  7. Kanbo, `Amal-i Salih (text: Lahore, 1967), v. 2 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  8. A. Butterworth and V.V. Chetty. A Collection of the Inscriptions on Copper- Plates & Stones in the Nellore District (Madras, 1905), v. 3 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  9. Khafi Khan, Khafi Khan’s History of `Alamgir, tr. S.M. Haq (Karachi, 1975) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  10. A. Cunningham, Four Reports Made during 1862-65 (Varanasi, 1972) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  11. S.N. Sinha, Subah of Allahabad under the Great Mughals (New Delhi, 1974) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  12. Saqi Must`ad Khan, Maasir-i `Alamgiri, tr. J. Sarkar (Calcutta, 1947) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  13. Saqi Must`ad Khan, Maasir-i `Alamgiri (text: Calcutta, 1871) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  14. Nizamuddin Ahmad, Tabaqat-i Akbari, tr. B. De (Calcutta, 1973), 3 vols. · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  15. Ishwardas Nagar, Futuhat-i `Alamgiri, tr. T. Ahmad (Delhi, 1978) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  16. Surendranath Sen, ed. & tr., Siva Chhatrapati (Calcutta, 1920), v.1 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  17. P. Sreenivasachar, ed., Corpus of Inscriptions in the Telingana Districts of H.E.M. the Nizam’s Dominions, pt. 2 (Hyderabad, 1940) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  18. Shah Nawaz Khan, Maathir-ul-Umara, tr. H. Beveridge (Patna, 1979), v. 1 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  19. Z.A. Desai, Published Muslim Inscriptions of Rajasthan (Jaipur, 1971) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  20. G. Roerich, tr., Biography of Dharmaswamin (Patna, 1959) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  21. Minhaj-i Siraj, Tabakat-i Nasiri, tr. H. Raverty (New Delhi, 1970), v. 1 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  22. Chattopadhyaya, D., ed., Taranatha’s History of Buddhism in India (Calcutta, 1980) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  23. Hasan Nizami, Taj al-ma`athir, in Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 2 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  24. Amir Khusrau, Miftah al-futuh, in Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 3 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  25. Amir Khusrau, Khaza’in al-futuh, in Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 3 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  26. Shams-i Siraj, Tarikh-i Firuz Shahi, in Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 3 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  27. Zia al-Din Barani, Tarikh-i Firuz Shahi, Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 3 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  28. Khwajah Ni`mat Allah, Tarikh-i Khan-Jahani wa makhzan-i-Afghani (text: Dacca, 1960), v. 1 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  29. Sikandar bin Muhammad, Mirat-i Sikandari, in E.C. Bayley, Local Muhammadan Dynasties: Gujarat, ed. N Singh (repr. New Delhi, 1970) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  30. Azad al-Husaini, Nau-Bahar-i Murshid Quli Khani, tr., Jadu Nath Sarkar, Bengal Nawabs (1952, repr. Calcutta, 1985) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  31. Abd al-Hamid Lahori, Badshah-nama, in Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 7 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  32. South Indian Inscriptions (New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  33. George Michell, “City as Cosmogram,” South Asian Studies 8 (1992) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  34. Jonaraja, Rajatarangini, ed. S.L. Sadhu, trans. J.C. Dutt (repr. New Delhi, 1993) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  35. Iqtidar Husain Siddiqui, tr., Waqi`at-e-Mushtaqui of Shaikh Rizq Ullah Mushtaqui (New Delhi, 1993) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  36. Jagadish Narayan Sarkar, Life of Mir Jumla (Calcutta, 1952) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
Bangladesh 1989 incident report: translation reproduced in Goel, volume I appendix · 42 records

Translation attributed to the Hindu Buddhist Christian Unity Council. The translated report was read; its original Bengali edition and independent corroboration remain unexamined. Named shrines are leads, not adjudicated events. Source-era district names and uncertain localities are preserved. Unnamed regional totals are not multiplied into temples.

Read original inventory ↗

Accessed 2026-09-28 · Reported incidents / translated compilation