A larger record.
Open to examination.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 67; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 10:335. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 31; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 14-3:181. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 25; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 14-3:177. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 12; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 27:146. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 17; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 25:75-76. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 72; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 18:786;12:108. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 54; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 6-3:277. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 41; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 6-2:308. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 71; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 12:107;18:449. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 5; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 23:224. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 40; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 6-2:306. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 3; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 23:216-17. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 36; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 14-3:513. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 19; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 25:91. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 38; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 2(1963):28-29. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 37; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 6-4:135. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 33; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 2(1962):57-58. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 30; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 34:54. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 70; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 12:57-61. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 43; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 35:81. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 7; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 20:90. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 48; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 4(Jun 1927):101-4. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 45; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 14-1:378. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 8; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 22:319. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 58; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 7:102-3. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 27; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 14-3:648. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 22; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 17:114. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 61; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 1(1937-38):53n2. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 49; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 28:413-15. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 23; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 26:314. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 56; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 5:254. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 24; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 3(1963-64):146. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 2; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 23:216-17. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 76; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 19:157. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 34; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 29:98-99. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 26; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 6-4:3. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 16; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 25:75. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 59; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 3(1953-54):68-9. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 55; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 32-5:1312. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 78; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 1 (1933):42. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.