A larger record.
Open to examination.

Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗

Annex 8, PDF page 83, serial 119

Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.

Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗

Annex 8, PDF page 82, serial 32, PI K-180

Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.

Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗

Annex 8, PDF page 83, serial 65

Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.

Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗

Annex 8, PDF page 82, serial 29, PI K-157

Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.

Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗

Annex 8, PDF page 82, serial 55, PI P-133a

Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.

Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗

Annex 8, PDF page 84, serial 138

Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.

Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗

Annex 8, PDF page 82, serial 2, PI K-202

Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.

Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗

Annex 8, PDF page 82, serial 13

Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.

Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗

Annex 8, PDF page 82, serial 6, PI K-189

Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.

Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗

Annex 8, PDF page 83, serial 84

Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 51; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 6-3:267. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 1; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 23:215. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 68; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 2(1963):53-54. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 42; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 1(1933):36. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 57; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 31:36. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 6; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 23:223. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 69; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 11:65-68;13:88. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 50; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 6-3:82-84. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 13; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 27:148. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 10; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 21:621-22. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 77; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 12:241. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 28; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 34:54. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 62; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 1(1919-20):16. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 21; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 1(1919-20):16. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 18; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 25:90-91. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 74; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 12:117. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 64; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 9:142-43. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 53; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 6-3:274. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 75; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 1(1937-38):55. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 79; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 2(1959-60):65. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 4; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 1(1911):13. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 35; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 14-3:220-21. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 15; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 24:543. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 65; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 9:154,156-57. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 47; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 6-3:212. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 32; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 6-4:5. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 39; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 14-3:259-61. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 66; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 36:249. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 52; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 1(1933-34):24. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 ↗

Table entry 46; printed pages 68–69

Underlying reference code: 14-1:402. See the publication’s numbered bibliography; capture does not mean that original was consulted.

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.