2,289 extracted source records. 146 mapped histories.
Browse named entries from historical surveys, archaeological registers and official damage assessments. These are source records, not a count of unique destroyed temples. Several entries may concern the same place; one entry may describe a group. Each preserves its source and the work still needed.
Interactive search could not load. You can still browse the pages and download the catalogue.
Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Pir Jumna
Bijapur · Bijapur District · KARNATAKA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KARNATAKA; Bijapur District; Bijapur; extracted line 2036
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-868ab2ff783a Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Pir Kilkili Shah
Sirsawa · Saharanpur District · UTTAR PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
UTTAR PRADESH; Saharanpur District; Sirsawa; extracted line 4636
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-e405775e5037 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Pir Lohani
Kharagpur · Midnapur District · BENGAL
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
BENGAL; Midnapur District; Kharagpur; extracted line 905
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-44d8ead44ee3 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Pir Mabari Khandayat
Bijapur · Bijapur District · KARNATAKA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KARNATAKA; Bijapur District; Bijapur; extracted line 2034
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-26bf0a99174f Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Pir Qutbu’d-Din
Urancheri · Thanjavur District · TAMIL NADU
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
TAMIL NADU; Thanjavur District; Urancheri; extracted line 3900
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-4346cfecf51e Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Pir Turk Shahid or Shah Wilayat (d
Narnaul · Mahendergarh District · HARYANA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
HARYANA; Mahendergarh District; Narnaul; extracted line 1822
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-b024691cc8bb Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Pir Zahiru’d-Din
Nagaur · Nagaur District · RAJASTHAN
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
RAJASTHAN; Nagaur District; Nagaur; extracted line 3502
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-3a9d63b2b119 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Qabil Shah
Khambhat · Kheda District · GUJARAT
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
GUJARAT; Kheda District; Khambhat; extracted line 1543
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-7591a0a0662f Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Qalandar Shah
Kawripet · South Arcot District · TAMIL NADU
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
TAMIL NADU; South Arcot District; Kawripet; extracted line 3826
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-2ad014121547 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Qayim Shah who destroyed twelve temples
Tiruchirapalli · Tiruchirapalli District · TAMIL NADU
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
TAMIL NADU; Tiruchirapalli District; Tiruchirapalli; extracted line 3947
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-e95b7acf3b20 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Qutbu’d-Din
Danteshwar · Baroda District · GUJARAT
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
GUJARAT; Baroda District; Danteshwar; extracted line 1395
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-cd276fde5c82 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Ramzan Shah
Khari · Parbhani District · MAHARASHTRA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
MAHARASHTRA; Parbhani District; Khari; extracted line 3014
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-77d9d1ea70dc Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Rashidu’d-Din Shahid
Didwana · Nagaur District · RAJASTHAN
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
RAJASTHAN; Nagaur District; Didwana; extracted line 3433
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-b726cd6b6c55 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Sadle Sahib of Makka
Mamdapur · Bijapur District · KARNATAKA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KARNATAKA; Bijapur District; Mamdapur; extracted line 2051
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-5985416e6234 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Sadoba Pir
Panhala · Kolhapur District · MAHARASHTRA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
MAHARASHTRA; Kolhapur District; Panhala; extracted line 2960
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-412d657dc6c6 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Sahib Padshah Qadiri
Vellore · North Arcot District · TAMIL NADU
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
TAMIL NADU; North Arcot District; Vellore; extracted line 3769
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-484abec2880d Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Saqi Sultan
Rohtasgarh · Shahabad District · BIHAR
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
BIHAR; Shahabad District; Rohtasgarh; extracted line 1115
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-656fa977c45a Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Sayyid Abdul Wahhab
Tiruchirapalli · Tiruchirapalli District · TAMIL NADU
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
TAMIL NADU; Tiruchirapalli District; Tiruchirapalli; extracted line 3919
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-0ddd01beb9f5 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Sayyid Ashraf Jahangir Simnani
Isuli · Sultanpur District · UTTAR PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
UTTAR PRADESH; Sultanpur District; Isuli; extracted line 4656
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-f1ccde7c0400 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Sayyid Chiragh
Palwal · Faridabad District · HARYANA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
HARYANA; Faridabad District; Palwal; extracted line 1706
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-60cd18bd6e13 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Sayyid Din Panah
Daira Din Panah · Muzaffarnagar District · UTTAR PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
UTTAR PRADESH; Muzaffarnagar District; Daira Din Panah; extracted line 4539
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-01c8c16072a7 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Sayyid Husain
Chidambaram · South Arcot District · TAMIL NADU
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
TAMIL NADU; South Arcot District; Chidambaram; extracted line 3816
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-59ab01bf72d9 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Sayyid Husainu’d-Din Tigh-i-Barhna (naked sword)
Gulbarga · Gulbarga District · KARNATAKA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KARNATAKA; Gulbarga District; Gulbarga; extracted line 2158
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-43da6b445a76 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Sayyid Ishaq or Maghribi Shah
Veraval · Junagarh District · GUJARAT
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
GUJARAT; Junagarh District; Veraval; extracted line 1499
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-4a5ed00d69a9 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Sayyid Jalal Qadiri
Tiruchirapalli · Tiruchirapalli District · TAMIL NADU
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
TAMIL NADU; Tiruchirapalli District; Tiruchirapalli; extracted line 3953
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-16252f6911c3 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Sayyid Karimu’d-Din Qadiri
Tiruchirapalli · Tiruchirapalli District · TAMIL NADU
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
TAMIL NADU; Tiruchirapalli District; Tiruchirapalli; extracted line 3931
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-5e1911ec9542 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Sayyid Muhammad Siwistani
Biharsharif · Nalanda District · BIHAR
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
BIHAR; Nalanda District; Biharsharif; extracted line 1026
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-700dd4970752 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Sayyid Sadrau’d-Din
Pimpri · Nasik District · MAHARASHTRA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
MAHARASHTRA; Nasik District; Pimpri; extracted line 2999
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-24360f0ad550 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Sayyid Warah
Palwal · Faridabad District · HARYANA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
HARYANA; Faridabad District; Palwal; extracted line 1710
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-fbfd6bcbcb00 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Sayyid Zainu’l-Ãbidin at Tinur
Tiruchirapalli · Tiruchirapalli District · TAMIL NADU
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
TAMIL NADU; Tiruchirapalli District; Tiruchirapalli; extracted line 3929
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-9b16912813fe Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Shah Abdu’r-Rahim
Manjakupham · South Arcot District · TAMIL NADU
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
TAMIL NADU; South Arcot District; Manjakupham; extracted line 3827
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-2ce8114d8499 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Shah Abdul Aziz
Bidar · Bidar District · KARNATAKA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KARNATAKA; Bidar District; Bidar; extracted line 1952
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-560f21416c58 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Shah Abdul Razzaq
Kondapalli · Krishna District · ANDHRA PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
ANDHRA PRADESH; Krishna District; Kondapalli; extracted line 501
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-772f9795c983 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Shah Abu’l-Hasan Qadiri
Vellore · North Arcot District · TAMIL NADU
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
TAMIL NADU; North Arcot District; Vellore; extracted line 3757
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-3ebaeadfb22d Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Shah Ahmad
Acharwak · Chingleput District · TAMIL NADU
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
TAMIL NADU; Chingleput District; Acharwak; extracted line 3592
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-5a07a5be71c2 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Shah Ali Mastan
Munropet · Chingleput District · TAMIL NADU
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
TAMIL NADU; Chingleput District; Munropet; extracted line 3607
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-433dedc898d2 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Shah Bahlol Shahid
Khambhat · Kheda District · GUJARAT
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
GUJARAT; Kheda District; Khambhat; extracted line 1547
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-017870ba87ef Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Shah Fazlu’llah Qadiri
Tiruchirapalli · Tiruchirapalli District · TAMIL NADU
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
TAMIL NADU; Tiruchirapalli District; Tiruchirapalli; extracted line 3921
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-dcbfce0dd72b Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Shah Ghulam Husain
Ellichpur · Amravati District · MAHARASHTRA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
MAHARASHTRA; Amravati District; Ellichpur; extracted line 2832
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-7e1c23a464d0 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedMazar of Shah Imamu’d-Din Qadiri
Tiruchirapalli · Tiruchirapalli District · TAMIL NADU
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
TAMIL NADU; Tiruchirapalli District; Tiruchirapalli; extracted line 3935
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-d222d2f4dc1b The full source bodies remain in the research cache. This public catalogue contains an index of factual fields and source locators. It is incomplete, and the source families have different coverage and evidentiary limits.